On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 05:07:39PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Obviously this is a judgement call on your part... but did you at least > consider passing sym_hcb for all cases instead? I did. There's a lot of crap stored in the sym_hcb that needs to move to the sym_data, so Scsi_host is going to become more prevalent and shm_hcb less used in future. If sym2 were going to stay structured as it is, this would be a bad move, but with the future changes I have planned, we reach the tipping point fairly soon. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
