On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 01:56:48PM +0530, Anuj Gupta wrote: > > Just curious, do you have any user of the more fine grained checking > > in NVMe? If not we could support the SCSI semantics only and emulate > > them using the fine grained NVMe semantics and have no portability > > problems. > > We can choose to support scsi semantics only and expose only the valid > scsi combinations to userspace i.e. > > 1. no check > 2. guard check only > 3. ref + app check only > 4. guard + ref + app check > > Something like this [*] on top of this series, untested though. Does > this align with what you have in mind? That is indeed what I had in mind. But I'd really like to hear from Martin on this as well.
