Re: [PATCH V1 3/3] scsi: ufs: qcom: Add support for multiple ICE algorithms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 05/10/2024 à 08:43, Ram Kumar Dwivedi a écrit :
Add support for ICE algorithms for Qualcomm UFS V5.0 and above which
uses a pool of crypto cores for TX stream (UFS Write – Encryption)
and RX stream (UFS Read – Decryption).

Using these algorithms, crypto cores can be dynamically allocated
to either RX stream or TX stream based on algorithm selected.
Qualcomm UFS controller supports three ICE algorithms:
Floor based algorithm, Static Algorithm and Instantaneous algorithm
to share crypto cores between TX and RX stream.

Floor Based allocation is selected by default after power On or Reset.

Co-developed-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h |  38 +++++-
  2 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Hi,

a few nitpicks below.


diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
index 810e637047d0..c0ca835f13f3 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -105,6 +105,217 @@ static struct ufs_qcom_host *rcdev_to_ufs_host(struct reset_controller_dev *rcd)
  }
#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO
+/*
+ * Default overrides:
+ * There're 10 sets of settings for floor-based algorithm
+ */
+static struct ice_alg2_config alg2_config[] = {

I think that this could easily be a const struct.

+	{"G0", {5, 12, 0, 0, 32, 0}},
+	{"G1", {12, 5, 32, 0, 0, 0}},
+	{"G2", {6, 11, 4, 1, 32, 1}},
+	{"G3", {6, 11, 7, 1, 32, 1}},
+	{"G4", {7, 10, 11, 1, 32, 1}},
+	{"G5", {7, 10, 14, 1, 32, 1}},
+	{"G6", {8, 9, 18, 1, 32, 1}},
+	{"G7", {9, 8, 21, 1, 32, 1}},
+	{"G8", {10, 7, 24, 1, 32, 1}},
+	{"G9", {10, 7, 32, 1, 32, 1}},
+};
+
+/**

This does nor look like a kernel-doc. Just /* ?

+ * Refer struct ice_alg2_config
+ */
+static inline void __get_alg2_grp_params(unsigned int *val, int *c, int *t)
+{
+	*c = ((val[0] << 8) | val[1] | (1 << 31));
+	*t = ((val[2] << 24) | (val[3] << 16) | (val[4] << 8) | val[5]);
+}

...

+/**
+ * ufs_qcom_ice_config_alg2 - Floor based ICE algorithm
+ *
+ * @hba: host controller instance
+ * Return: zero for success and non-zero in case of a failure.
+ */
+static int ufs_qcom_ice_config_alg2(struct ufs_hba *hba)
+{
+	struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
+	unsigned int reg = REG_UFS_MEM_ICE_ALG2_NUM_CORE_0;
+	/* 6 values for each group, refer struct ice_alg2_config */
+	unsigned int override_val[ICE_ALG2_NUM_PARAMS];
+	char name[8] = {0};
+	int i, ret;
+
+	ufshcd_writel(hba, FLOOR_BASED_ALG2, REG_UFS_MEM_ICE_CONFIG);
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(alg2_config); i++) {
+		int core = 0, task = 0;
+
+		if (host->ice_conf) {
+			snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s%d", "g", i);

Why not just "g%d"?

+			ret = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(host->ice_conf,
+								  name,
+								  override_val,
+								  ICE_ALG2_NUM_PARAMS,
+								  ICE_ALG2_NUM_PARAMS);

...

CJ





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux