Re: [PATCH 0/5] hyper-v: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed,  2 Oct 2024 20:53:28 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Code specific to Hyper-V guests currently assumes the cpu_possible_mask
> is "dense" -- i.e., all bit positions 0 thru (nr_cpu_ids - 1) are set,
> with no "holes". Therefore, num_possible_cpus() is assumed to be equal
> to nr_cpu_ids.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [1/5] x86/hyperv: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
    (no matching commit)
  - [2/5] Drivers: hv: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
    (no matching commit)
  - [3/5] iommu/hyper-v: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
    (no matching commit)
  - [4/5] scsi: storvsc: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
    (no matching commit)
  - [net-next,5/5] hv_netvsc: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c86ab60b92d1

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux