Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] ufs: core: fix error handler process for MCQ abort

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2024-09-23 at 11:19 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>  	 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>  On 9/23/24 1:03 AM, peter.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > When the error handler successfully aborts a MCQ request,
> > it only releases the command and does not notify the SCSI layer.
> > This may cause another abort after 30 seconds timeout.
> > This patch notifies the SCSI layer to requeue the request.
> > 
> > Additionally, ignore the OCS: ABORTED CQ slot after MCQ mode
> > SQ cleanup. This makes the behavior of MCQ mode consistent with
> > that of legacy SDB mode.
> > 
> > Also, print logs for OCS: ABORTED and OCS_INVALID_COMMAND_STATUS
> > for debugging purposes.
> 
> Although I like the approach of this patch, two comments below.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > index a6f818cdef0e..b5c7bc50a27e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -5405,9 +5405,15 @@ ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(struct ufs_hba
> *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp,
> >   break;
> >   case OCS_ABORTED:
> >   result |= DID_ABORT << 16;
> > +dev_warn(hba->dev,
> > +"OCS aborted from controller = %x for tag %d\n",
> > +ocs, lrbp->task_tag);
> >   break;
> 
> Including the OCS status in this message seems redundant to me.
> 
> >   case OCS_INVALID_COMMAND_STATUS:
> >   result |= DID_REQUEUE << 16;
> > +dev_warn(hba->dev,
> > +"OCS invaild from controller = %x for tag %d\n",
> > +ocs, lrbp->task_tag);
> 
> Also here, including the OCS status in this message seems redundant
> to me.
> 
> Please change "invaild" into "invalid".

Hi Bart,

Okay, I will revise the content printed here.


> 
> > @@ -5526,6 +5532,18 @@ void ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(struct ufs_hba
> *hba, int task_tag,
> >   ufshcd_update_monitor(hba, lrbp);
> >   ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, task_tag, UFS_CMD_COMP);
> >   cmd->result = ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(hba, lrbp, cqe);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Ignore MCQ OCS: ABORTED posted by the host controller.
> > + * This makes the behavior of MCQ mode consistent with that
> > + * of legacy SDB mode.
> > + */
> > +if (hba->mcq_enabled) {
> > +ocs = ufshcd_get_tr_ocs(lrbp, cqe);
> > +if (ocs == OCS_ABORTED)
> > +return;
> > +}
> 
> Why only ignore the OCS_ABORTED status in MCQ mode? Is my
> understanding
> correct that MediaTek controllers can also report this status in
> legacy 
> mode?
> 
> Thanks,

Because according to the specification, only MCQ will have 
OCS: ABORTED. MediaTek, even with a quirk handling SDB OCS ABORTED,
cannot simply ignore it here and not deal with it. 
Otherwise, it would need to release directly like MCQ ufshcd_abort_one.

Thanks
Peter


> 
> Bart.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux