> Has it been considered to remove the ufshcd_wait_for_register() function and > to use read_poll_timeout() directly in the > ufshcd_wait_for_register() callers? The above patch makes > ufshcd_wait_for_register() so short that it's probably better to remove this > function entirely. Yes - I thought about it. I think that the wait_for_register makes it much clearer what the function actually does, And for that reason, only, it worth keeping the function name. However, if it’s a must I can remove it as you suggested. Thanks, Avri > > Thanks, > > Bart.
