Re: [PATCHv4 01/10] blk-mq: unconditional nr_integrity_segments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 01/10] blk-mq: unconditional nr_integrity_segments
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:47:20 -0400
Cc: <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, <hch@xxxxxx>, <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240911201240.3982856-2-kbusch@meta.com> (Keith Busch's message of "Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:12:31 -0700")
Organization: Oracle Corporation

Keith,

> Always defining the field will make using it easier and less error prone
> in future patches.

Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCHv4 00/10] block integrity merging and counting
  - From: Keith Busch
- [PATCHv4 01/10] blk-mq: unconditional nr_integrity_segments
  - From: Keith Busch

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Update lpfc to revision 14.4.0.5
Next by Date: Re: [PATCHv4 02/10] blk-mq: set the nr_integrity_segments from bio
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHv4 01/10] blk-mq: unconditional nr_integrity_segments
Next by thread: [PATCHv4 05/10] block: provide a request helper for user integrity segments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux