Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ufs: core: requeue aborted request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/10/24 11:03 PM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
This statement is not quite accurate becasue in UFSHIC2.1, SDB mode
specification already have OCS: ABORTED (0x6) define.
And it is used in below UTRLCLR description:
'which means a Transfer Request was "aborted"'
Therefore, the host controller should follow the
specification and fill the OCS field with OCS: ABORTED.
If not so, at what point does your host controller use the
OCS: ABORTED status?

Hmm ... I have not been able to find any explanation in the UFSHCI 2.1
specification that says when the OCS status is set to aborted. Did I
perhaps overlook something?

This is what I found in the UTRLCLR description: "The host software shall use this field only when a UTP Transfer Request is expected to
not be completed, e.g., when the host software receives a “FUNCTION
COMPLETE” Task Management response which means a Transfer Request was
aborted." This does not mean that the host controller is expected to
set the OCS status to "ABORTED". I will send an email to the JC-64
mailing list to request clarification.

+/*
+ * When the host software receives a "FUNCTION COMPLETE", set flag
+ * to requeue command after receive response with OCS_ABORTED
+ * SDB mode: UTRLCLR Task Management response which means a
Transfer
+ *           Request was aborted.
+ * MCQ mode: Host will post to CQ with OCS_ABORTED after SQ
cleanup
+ * This flag is set because ufshcd_abort_all forcibly aborts all
+ * commands, and the host will automatically fill in the OCS field
+ * of the corresponding response with OCS_ABORTED.
+ * Therefore, upon receiving this response, it needs to be
requeued.
+ */
+if (!err)
+lrbp->abort_initiated_by_err = true;
+
   err = ufshcd_clear_cmd(hba, tag);
   if (err)
   dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed clearing cmd at tag %d, err %d\n",

The above change is misplaced. ufshcd_try_to_abort_task() can be
called
when the SCSI core decides to abort a command while
abort_initiated_by_err must not be set in that case. Please move the
above code block into ufshcd_abort_one().

But move to ufshcd_abort_one may have race condition, beacause we
need set this flag before ufshcd_clear_cmd host controller fill
OCS_ABORTED to response. I will add check ufshcd_eh_in_progress.

Calling ufshcd_clear_cmd() does not affect the OCS status as far as I
know. Did I perhaps overlook something?

Thanks,

Bart.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux