Re: [PATCHv3 10/10] blk-merge: properly account for integrity segments
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCHv3 10/10] blk-merge: properly account for integrity segments
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:49:13 +0200
Cc
: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx, Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
20240904152605.4055570-11-kbusch@meta.com
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
References
:
[PATCHv3 00/10] block integrity merging and counting
From:
Keith Busch
[PATCHv3 10/10] blk-merge: properly account for integrity segments
From:
Keith Busch
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCHv3 09/10] blk-integrity: consider entire bio list for merging
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCHv3 06/10] blk-integrity: simplify counting segments
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCHv3 10/10] blk-merge: properly account for integrity segments
Next by thread:
[PATCH v3] sd: Retry START STOP UNIT commands
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]
