Re: [PATCH v6 10/17] soc: qcom: ice: add support for hardware wrapped keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6.09.2024 8:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Gaurav Kashyap <quic_gaurkash@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Now that HWKM support has been added to ICE, extend the ICE driver to
> support hardware wrapped keys programming coming in from the storage
> controllers (UFS and eMMC). This is similar to raw keys where the call is
> forwarded to Trustzone, however we also need to clear and re-enable
> CFGE before and after programming the key.
> 
> Derive software secret support is also added by forwarding the call to
> the corresponding SCM API.
> 
> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Om Prakash Singh <quic_omprsing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kashyap <quic_gaurkash@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

[...]


> +static int qcom_ice_program_wrapped_key(struct qcom_ice *ice,
> +					const struct blk_crypto_key *key,
> +					u8 data_unit_size, int slot)
> +{
> +	union crypto_cfg cfg;
> +	int hwkm_slot;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	hwkm_slot = translate_hwkm_slot(ice, slot);
> +
> +	memset(&cfg, 0, sizeof(cfg));

union crypto_cfg cfg = { 0 };

?

> +	cfg.dusize = data_unit_size;
> +	cfg.capidx = QCOM_SCM_ICE_CIPHER_AES_256_XTS;
> +	cfg.cfge = 0x80;

Or just partially initialize it at declaration time?

Also, what's 0x80?

Konrad




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux