On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:02:45PM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > volatile here is probably nonsense. Either you need proper locking on this > struct in case there may be side-effects between different callers or it's > unneeded at all. This looks really suspicious: Yes, it's most likely wrong. But for now there's a really huge plate of patches already, and we'd rather keep behaviour similar. Once we've managed to actually test this big pile we can move on to cleaning up things like that. And I suspect part of the right solution will be to get rid of this busy loop entirely. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
