Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: ufs: qcom: update MODE_MAX cfg_bw value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 06:55:26PM +0530, Manish Pandey wrote:
> The cfg_bw value for max mode was incorrect for the Qualcomm SoC.

What do you mean by 'incorrect'? I extracted the value from downstream DTs. So
it cannot be incorrect.

If you want to update it, please clearly provide the reason.

And if this patch is addressing an issue, then a Fixes tag should be present. If
you want to get it backported (if it is a critical fix), then stable list should
be CCed.

- Mani

> Update it to the correct value for cfg_bw max mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manish Pandey <quic_mapa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index c87fdc849c62..ecdfff2456e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static const struct __ufs_qcom_bw_table {
>  	[MODE_HS_RB][UFS_HS_G3][UFS_LANE_2] = { 1492582,	204800 },
>  	[MODE_HS_RB][UFS_HS_G4][UFS_LANE_2] = { 2915200,	409600 },
>  	[MODE_HS_RB][UFS_HS_G5][UFS_LANE_2] = { 5836800,	819200 },
> -	[MODE_MAX][0][0]		    = { 7643136,	307200 },
> +	[MODE_MAX][0][0]		    = { 7643136,	819200 },
>  };
>  
>  static void ufs_qcom_get_default_testbus_cfg(struct ufs_qcom_host *host);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux