Re: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:50:55 -0700
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, fstests <fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240827020714.GK6047@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 07:07:14PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed the following regression in generic/351 between
> 6.11-rc4 and -rc5?

Yes, I'm seeing this with a fresh -rc5 build.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

References:
- regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Apply DELAY_AFTER_LPM quirk for Toshiba devices
Previous by thread: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
Next by thread: Re: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux