Re: [REGRESSION] critical target error, bisected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] critical target error, bisected
From: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 07:08:42 +0100
Cc: fengli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <yq1ikw1qg49.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>

On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 at 04:56, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would appreciate if you could test the following patch.

Works for me.

Tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [REGRESSION] critical target error, bisected
  - From: Chris Bainbridge
- Re: [REGRESSION] critical target error, bisected
  - From: Martin K. Petersen

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ufs: core: Add a quirk for handling broken LSDBS field in controller capabilities register
Next by Date: [PATCH v3 0/2] ufs: qcom: Fix probe failure on SM8550 SoC due to broken LSDBS field
Previous by thread: Re: [REGRESSION] critical target error, bisected
Next by thread: Re: [REGRESSION] critical target error, bisected
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux