Re: [PATCH 2/3] ufs: core: Add a quirk for handling broken SDBS field in controller capabilities register

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:29:11AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/14/24 10:15 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > 'Legacy Queue & Single Doorbell Support (SDBS)' field in the controller
> > capabilities register is supposed to be reserved for UFSHCI 3.0 based
> > controllers and should read as 0. But some controllers may report bogus
> > value of 1 due to the hardware bug. So let's add a quirk to handle those
> > controllers.
> > 
> > If the quirk is enabled by the controller driver and MCQ is not supported,
> > then 'hba->sdbs_sup' field will be ignored and the SCSI device will be
> > added in legacy/single doorbell mode.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 5 +++--
> >   include/ufs/ufshcd.h      | 7 +++++++
> >   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > index 168b9dbc3ada..acb6f261ecc2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -10512,8 +10512,9 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> >   	}
> >   	if (!is_mcq_supported(hba)) {
> > -		if (!hba->sdbs_sup) {
> > -			dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to initialize (legacy doorbell mode not supported)\n",
> > +		if (!(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_SDBS_CAP) && !hba->sdbs_sup) {
> > +			dev_err(hba->dev,
> > +				"%s: failed to initialize (legacy doorbell mode not supported)\n",
> >   				__func__);
> >   			err = -EINVAL;
> >   			goto out_disable;
> 
> Adding a check for the UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_SDBS_CAP quirk everywhere
> hba->sdbs_sup is tested is wrong. Please move this check to the code
> that assigns a value to hba->sdbs_sup.
> 

I thought it wouldn't matter since it is used in just one place, but I agree it
is best to keep it in assignment itself.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux