Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Don't check REQ_ATOMIC for reads
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Don't check REQ_ATOMIC for reads
From
: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:40:37 +0530
Cc
: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cms-type
: 105P
Dlp-filter
: Pass
In-reply-to
: <
20240805113315.1048591-3-john.g.garry@oracle.com
>
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.1
Reviewed-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
References
:
[PATCH 0/2] block atomic writes tidy-ups/fix
From:
John Garry
[PATCH 2/2] block: Don't check REQ_ATOMIC for reads
From:
John Garry
Prev by Date:
[PATCH v3 15/15] blk-mq: use hk cpus only when isolcpus=io_queue is enabled
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: sd: Don't check if a write for REQ_ATOMIC
Previous by thread:
[PATCH 2/2] block: Don't check REQ_ATOMIC for reads
Next by thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/2] block atomic writes tidy-ups/fix
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]
