[PATCH] ufs: Use of_property_present()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Use of_property_present() to test for property presence rather than
of_find_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove callers
of of_find_property() and similar functions. of_find_property() leaks
the DT struct property and data pointers which is a problem for
dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/ufs/host/ufshcd-pltfrm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufshcd-pltfrm.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufshcd-pltfrm.c
index a3e69ecafd27..2e1eb898a27c 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufshcd-pltfrm.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufshcd-pltfrm.c
@@ -272,10 +272,10 @@ static int ufshcd_parse_operating_points(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	const char **clk_names;
 	int cnt, i, ret;
 
-	if (!of_find_property(np, "operating-points-v2", NULL))
+	if (!of_property_present(np, "operating-points-v2"))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (of_find_property(np, "freq-table-hz", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(np, "freq-table-hz")) {
 		dev_err(dev, "%s: operating-points and freq-table-hz are incompatible\n",
 			 __func__);
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.43.0





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux