On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 14:38 +0800, peter.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > @@ -8171,7 +8171,10 @@ static void ufshcd_update_rtc(struct ufs_hba > *hba) > */ > val = ts64.tv_sec - hba->dev_info.rtc_time_baseline; > > - ufshcd_rpm_get_sync(hba); > + /* Skip update RTC if RPM state is not RPM_ACTIVE */ > + if (ufshcd_rpm_get_if_active(hba) <= 0) > + return; > + > err = ufshcd_query_attr(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_WRITE_ATTR, > QUERY_ATTR_IDN_SECONDS_PASSED, > 0, 0, &val); > ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(hba); My suggestion would be to not return here and just skip the update, but reschedule it for the next time that doesn't affect the suspend/resume flow you're worried about.
