[Bug 219027] New: The SCSI can't adjust Max xfer length (blocks) with different storage device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219027

            Bug ID: 219027
           Summary: The SCSI can't adjust Max xfer length (blocks) with
                    different storage device
           Product: SCSI Drivers
           Version: 2.5
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: high
          Priority: P3
         Component: Other
          Assignee: scsi_drivers-other@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
          Reporter: 983292588@xxxxxx
        Regression: No

My storage device CPU has a 64kB (limited by hardware) buffer used to cache
reads/writes which means it can only cache up to 128 blocks(512Byte) of memory.

But the Linux source code says that for USB2.0, the default max_sectors=240
blocks. So the SCSI Write-10 and Read-10 command has a total-blocks field that
can be up to 240 blocks (120KB) for USB2.0. 

When originally testing the product on Windows 11 it never writes more than 128
blocks at a time. However, when tested on Linux it sometimes writes more than
128 blocks(240 blocks as setting above), which causes the usb storage device to
crash. 


Is there a way to tell the Linux host OS not to request more than 128 blocks?

My storage device's firmware has implemented block limit VPD page (page =
0xB0), and it works well on Windows 10/11. I even set the block limit to be 64
blocks, it's OK too. Because before the data transfer, the windows host issue
an SCSI inquiry order with the VPD PAGE CODE = 0xB0, so the device could
transmit the block limits information to the host. And then the windows host
could adjust the amount of data transferred.

However, on Linux or MacOS, the host does not appear to be running the block
limits command. So maybe the host doesn't know what is the block limits. Then
the write/read blocks number beyond the buffer size.

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux