[PATCH] mpi3mr: correct a test in mpi3mr_sas_port_add

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The test for a possible shift overflow is not correct. Fix it by
replacing the '>' with a '>='.


Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
index 82aa4e418c5a..a454276fcc4c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
@@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@ static struct mpi3mr_sas_port *mpi3mr_sas_port_add(struct mpi3mr_ioc *mrioc,
 	mpi3mr_sas_port_sanity_check(mrioc, mr_sas_node,
 	    mr_sas_port->remote_identify.sas_address, hba_port);
 
-	if (mr_sas_node->num_phys > sizeof(mr_sas_port->phy_mask) * 8)
+	if (mr_sas_node->num_phys >= sizeof(mr_sas_port->phy_mask) * 8)
 		ioc_info(mrioc, "max port count %u could be too high\n",
 		    mr_sas_node->num_phys);
 
@@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static struct mpi3mr_sas_port *mpi3mr_sas_port_add(struct mpi3mr_ioc *mrioc,
 		    (mr_sas_node->phy[i].hba_port != hba_port))
 			continue;
 
-		if (i > sizeof(mr_sas_port->phy_mask) * 8) {
+		if (i >= sizeof(mr_sas_port->phy_mask) * 8) {
 			ioc_warn(mrioc, "skipping port %u, max allowed value is %zu\n",
 			    i, sizeof(mr_sas_port->phy_mask) * 8);
 			goto out_fail;
-- 
2.45.2





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux