Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 10:35:38AM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> 
> I failed to apply patch in your previous reply to 1122c0c1cc or current tip
> of axboe-block/for-next:
> c1440ed442a58 (axboe-block/for-next) Merge branch 'for-6.11/block' into for-next

That already includes it.

> 
> but it's ok to apply upon next:
> * 0fc4bfab2cd45 (tag: next-20240625) Add linux-next specific files for 20240625
> 
> I've already started the test based on this applyment.
> is the expectation that patch should not introduce performance change comparing
> to 0fc4bfab2cd45?
> 
> or if this applyment is not ok, please just give me guidance. Thanks!

The expectation is that the latest block branch (and thus linux-next)
doesn't see this performance change.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux