Re: [PATCH v2] ufs: core: fix ufshcd_abort_all racing issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/24/24 5:11 AM, peter.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> [ ... ]
In this patch there are two call traces, two fixes tags and two code
changes. Please split this patch into two patches with each one call
trace, one Fixes: tag and one code change. Additionally, please include
a changelog when posting a second or later version.

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
index 8944548c30fa..3b2e5bcb08a7 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
@@ -512,8 +512,9 @@ int ufshcd_mcq_sq_cleanup(struct ufs_hba *hba, int task_tag)
  		return -ETIMEDOUT;
if (task_tag != hba->nutrs - UFSHCD_NUM_RESERVED) {
-		if (!cmd)
-			return -EINVAL;
+		/* Should return 0 if cmd is already complete by irq */
+		if (!cmd || !ufshcd_cmd_inflight(cmd))
+			return 0;
  		hwq = ufshcd_mcq_req_to_hwq(hba, scsi_cmd_to_rq(cmd));
  	} else {
  		hwq = hba->dev_cmd_queue;

Does the call trace show that blk_mq_unique_tag() tries to dereference address 0x194? If so, how is this possible? There are
only two lrbp->cmd assignments in the UFS driver. These assignments
either assign a valid SCSI command pointer or NULL. Even after a SCSI
command has been completed, the SCSI command pointer remains valid. So
how can an invalid pointer be passed to blk_mq_unique_tag()? Please
root-cause this issue instead of posting a code change that reduces a
race window without closing the race window completely.

Thanks,

Bart.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux