On 18/06/2024 08:44, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
Use existing str_plural() function rather than duplicating its
implementation.
./drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_init.c:426:7-8: opportunity for str_plural(i).
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=9351__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Nk42u-g6x28V1UUeWge3hrl1nLg33NAY5X2JMyTeC3VEMsYPh4q3Tr6OYXMtxHEj16ZsS_-eV3fHIvS5qevQliZxzvj9NdOu$
I don't see why the kernel commit history should be polluted with such info.
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_init.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_init.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_init.c
index 9c8cc723170d..67017c03d4da 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_init.c
@@ -422,8 +422,8 @@ static void _sas_resume_ha(struct sas_ha_struct *ha, bool drain)
*/
i = phys_suspended(ha);
if (i)
- dev_info(ha->dev, "waiting up to 25 seconds for %d phy%s to resume\n",
- i, i > 1 ? "s" : "");
+ dev_info(ha->dev, "waiting up to 25 seconds for %d phy%s to resume\n", i,
+ str_plural(i));
Is this really better?
I actually think that the following is preferable:
"waiting up to 25 seconds for %d phy(s) to resume\n", i);
wait_event_timeout(ha->eh_wait_q, phys_suspended(ha) == 0, tmo);
for (i = 0; i < ha->num_phys; i++) {
struct asd_sas_phy *phy = ha->sas_phy[i];
