RE: [PATCH 08/14] scsi: fnic: Add functionality in fnic to support FDLS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, June 11, 2024 11:57 PM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 6/10/24 23:50, Karan Tilak Kumar wrote:
> > Add interfaces in fnic to use FDLS services.
> > Modify link up and link down functionality to use FDLS.
> > Replace existing interfaces to handle new functionality provided by
> > FDLS.
> > Modify data types of some data members to handle new functionality.
> > Add processing of tports and handling of tports.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sesidhar Baddela <sebaddel@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Arulprabhu Ponnusamy <arulponn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Gian Carlo Boffa <gcboffa@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c |  74 +++++
> >   drivers/scsi/fnic/fip.c       |  27 +-
> >   drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h      |  20 +-
> >   drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_fcs.c  | 498 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >   drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c |  10 +-
> >   drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c | 127 +++++++--
> >   6 files changed, 587 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
> >
> This seems to not just _add_ the functionality to use FDLS, but rather _replace_ the existing functionality with FDLS.
> IE it seems that after this change the driver will always do FDLS, causing a possible service interruption with existing setups.
> Hmm?

Thanks for your review comments, Hannes. 
As I mentioned in the other patch comments, Cisco has been shipping an async driver based on FDLS for the past six years.
The async driver is backward compatible and supports all the adapters that are supported by the existing upstream driver, and more.
The async driver in fact overrides the upstream driver on our installations.

On Cisco hardware, the best practice out in the field, is to update the driver to the async driver during OS installation itself.
Due to this best practice, we have _not_ received any feedback from customers indicating an abnormal service interruption specifically due to the driver update.

I hope this addresses your concerns about this issue.
Please feel free to share your thoughts or any other insights regarding this.

Regards,
Karan




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux