Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: core: Introduce the BLIST_SKIP_IO_HINTS flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bart!

> Prepare for skipping reading the IO hints VPD page for USB storage
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[...]
> @@ -3117,6 +3118,9 @@ static void sd_read_io_hints(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
>  	struct scsi_mode_data data;
>  	int res;
>  
> +	if (sdp->sdev_bflags & BLIST_SKIP_IO_HINTS)
> +		return;
> +
>  	res = scsi_mode_sense(sdp, /*dbd=*/0x8, /*modepage=*/0x0a,
>  			      /*subpage=*/0x05, buffer, SD_BUF_SIZE, SD_TIMEOUT,
>  			      sdkp->max_retries, &data, &sshdr);
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

s/IO hints VPD page/IO Advice Hints Grouping mode page/g

?

PS. I'm not fussy about Cc. But I generally avoid listing anybody who
will be automatically copied by virtue of any *-by: tags.

I tend to use Cc as an indicator that this entity needs to act upon the
patch in question. Ack, review, test, respond to comments, or merge in
case of stable@.

If a person listed in Cc subsequently responds with a tag, their name
may be listed more than once in the commit description. But I view that
as documentation that the person whose feedback was requested actually
responded. That's useful information as far as I'm concerned...

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux