On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 01:27:47PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >> > Note that unlike the NOCHECK flag which I just cleaned up because they > >> > were unused, this one actually does get in the way of the architecture > >> > of the whole series :( We could add a per-bip csum_type but it would > >> > feel really weird. > >> > >> Why would it feel weird? That's how it currently works. > > > > Because there's no way to have it set to anything but the per-queue > > one. > > That's what the io_uring passthrough changes enable. The checksum type? How is that compatible with nvme? Anyway, I'll just leave this flag in for the resend, but if we can't come up with a coherent user for it in a merge cycle or two (which I very much doubt) I'll send another patch to remove it.
