Re: [PATCH 03/11] block: remove the BIP_IP_CHECKSUM flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 01:27:47PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >> > Note that unlike the NOCHECK flag which I just cleaned up because they
> >> > were unused, this one actually does get in the way of the architecture
> >> > of the whole series :( We could add a per-bip csum_type but it would
> >> > feel really weird.
> >> 
> >> Why would it feel weird? That's how it currently works.
> >
> > Because there's no way to have it set to anything but the per-queue
> > one.
> 
> That's what the io_uring passthrough changes enable.

The checksum type?  How is that compatible with nvme?

Anyway, I'll just leave this flag in for the resend, but if we can't
come up with a coherent user for it in a merge cycle or two (which
I very much doubt) I'll send another patch to remove it.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux