On 24-05-31 13:16:40, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/31/24 03:38, Minwoo Im wrote:
> > +static int ufs_redhat_get_hba_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > +{
> > + return MAX_SUPP_MAC;
> > +}
>
> Why the prefix "ufs_redhat" instead of "ufs_qemu"?
I thouogh I had to use the same name pattern as ufs_intel_* for the name of
vendor ID of the PCI device. I will update it in the next version.
Thanks for the review.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
