Re: blktests failures with v6.10-rc1 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@xxxxxxxxx>, Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "nbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: blktests failures with v6.10-rc1 kernel
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 13:01:35 -0700
In-reply-to: <6cd21274-50b3-44c5-af48-179cbd08b1ba@linux.dev>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 5/31/24 07:35, Zhu Yanjun wrote:

IIRC, the problem with srp/002, 011 also occurs with siw driver, do you make
tests with siw driver to verify whether the problem with srp/002, 011 is also > fixed or not?


I have not yet seen any failures of any of the SRP tests when using the siw driver.
What am I missing?

Thanks,

Bart.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: blktests failures with v6.10-rc1 kernel
  - From: Zhu Yanjun

References:
- blktests failures with v6.10-rc1 kernel
  - From: Shinichiro Kawasaki
- Re: blktests failures with v6.10-rc1 kernel
  - From: Zhu Yanjun

Prev by Date: [PATCH] mpt3sas: Avoid test/set_bit() operating in non-allocated memory
Next by Date: Re: [REGRESSION] USB flash drive unusable with constant resets, since commit 4f53138fff
Previous by thread: Re: blktests failures with v6.10-rc1 kernel
Next by thread: Re: blktests failures with v6.10-rc1 kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]