RE: [PATCH v6 3/3] scsi: ufs: sysfs: Make max_number_of_rtt read-write

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 5/26/24 01:16, Avri Altman wrote:
> > +static inline void ufshcd_freez_hw_queues(struct ufs_hba *hba) {
> > +     struct scsi_device *sdev;
> > +
> > +     shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host) {
> > +             if (sdev == hba->ufs_device_wlun)
> > +                     continue;
> > +             blk_mq_freeze_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> > +             blk_mq_quiesce_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void ufshcd_unfreez_hw_queues(struct ufs_hba *hba) {
> > +     struct scsi_device *sdev;
> > +
> > +     shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host) {
> > +             if (sdev == hba->ufs_device_wlun)
> > +                     continue;
> > +             blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> > +             blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> > +     }
> > +}
> 
> Why have these functions been declared inline? blk_mq_freeze_queue() may
> sleep and hence performance is not an argument to inline these functions.
> Additionally, the WLUN should not be skipped when freezing or unfreezing
> request queues. The blk_mq_quiesce_queue() and
> blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() calls are not necessary in the above code.
> Please remove these.
OK.

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux