On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 07:08:10AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 5:31 AM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Another ambiguous use of strncpy() is to copy from strings that may not > > be NUL-terminated. These cases depend on having the destination buffer > > be explicitly larger than the source buffer's maximum size, having > > the size of the copy exactly match the source buffer's maximum size, > > and for the destination buffer to get explicitly NUL terminated. > > > > This usually happens when parsing protocols or hardware character arrays > > that are not guaranteed to be NUL-terminated. The code pattern is > > effectively this: > > > > char dest[sizeof(src) + 1]; > > > > strncpy(dest, src, sizeof(src)); > > dest[sizeof(dest) - 1] = '\0'; > > > > In practice it usually looks like: > > > > struct from_hardware { > > ... > > char name[HW_NAME_SIZE] __nonstring; > > ... > > }; > > > > struct from_hardware *p = ...; > > char name[HW_NAME_SIZE + 1]; > > > > strncpy(name, p->name, HW_NAME_SIZE); > > name[NW_NAME_SIZE] = '\0'; > > > > This cannot be replaced with: > > > > strscpy(name, p->name, sizeof(name)); > > > > because p->name is smaller and not NUL-terminated, so FORTIFY will > > trigger when strnlen(p->name, sizeof(name)) is used. And it cannot be > > replaced with: > > > > strscpy(name, p->name, sizeof(p->name)); > > > > because then "name" may contain a 1 character early truncation of > > p->name. > > > > Provide an unambiguous interface for converting a maybe not-NUL-terminated > > string to a NUL-terminated string, with compile-time buffer size checking > > so that it can never fail at runtime: memtostr() and memtostr_pad(). Also > > add KUnit tests for both. > > Obvious question, why can't strscpy() be fixed for this corner case? We would lose the ability to detect normal out-of-bounds reads, or at least make them ambiguous. I really want these APIs to have distinct and dependable semantics/behaviors. -- Kees Cook