RE: [PATCH v2 0/1] Remove support for legacy UFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin hi,
Could you please take a look at this?
I have another cleanup series pending.

Thanks,
Avri

> UFS1.0 and UFS1.1, published in the early 2010s, were more of a proof of
> concept rather than a mature functional spec. Toshiba was the only
> device manufacturer with the most accomplished phy team to come up with
> a small UFS1.0 device. Alas, there were no commercial platforms it can
> be paired with. Even UFS2.0 that was published in 2013, didn't really
> make it to the market: too moot to take effect. It's not until UFS2.1
> that was published in 2016, were a myriad of devices and platforms
> flooded the market. Designated to mobile devices, dictates a rapid short
> lives for those platforms. Hence, we can safely remove those pre-UFS2.1
> pieces of code.
> 
> Changes from v1:
>  - remove ufshcd_get_local_unipro_ver which practically mean squashing
>    patch 1 & 2 into a single patch (Christoph)
>  - restore an if clause to avoid functional change in
>    ufshcd_compl_one_cqe (Bart)
> 
> 
> Avri Altman (1):
>   scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions
> 
>  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c   | 174 +++---------------------------------
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c |   3 +-
>  include/ufs/ufshcd.h        |   2 -
>  include/ufs/ufshci.h        |   7 --
>  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.42.0






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux