Re: [PATCH v4 17/28] null_blk: Introduce fua attribute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Damien,

On 4/2/24 05:38, Damien Le Moal wrote:
+static bool g_fua = true;
+module_param_named(fua, g_fua, bool, S_IRUGO);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(zoned, "Enable/disable FUA support when cache_size is used. Default: true");
+

checkpatch is generating warning on this patch, please check :-

WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO' are not preferred. Consider using octal permissions '0444'.
#31: FILE: drivers/block/null_blk/main.c:229:
+module_param_named(fua, g_fua, bool, S_IRUGO);

Also, I noticed that for zone_append_max_sectors attribute patch
you are using 0444 but for fua you are using S_IRUGO, any specific
reason ?

-ck






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux