On Saturday, September 22, 2007 9:39 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > > Well, I'll put this in this time. However, it contains a > whole slew of > pointless changes like this: > > > > - mdelay (10); > > + udelay (10000); > > and > > > - mdelay(1); > > + udelay(1000); > > Which is going to excite the janitors into a frenzy of replace udelay > with mdelay patches, which I can well do without ... please don't do > this type of change unless there's some actual reason for it. > I recall the reason for this change. I found that medlay called during interrupt context didn't work well, whereas udelay did. Oringally when mpt_fault_reset_work was added, this code was called using timers, which as you know, is called as part of softirq bottom half handler. Since then, we converted mpt_fault_reset_work to being called using user context work task, so really its a non-issue I guess. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
