Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: document SC7180 UFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Document already upstreamed and used Qualcomm SC7180 UFS host controller
> to fix dtbs_check warnings like:
> 
>   sc7180-idp.dtb: ufshc@1d84000: compatible:0: 'qcom,sc7180-ufshc' is not one of ...
>   sc7180-idp.dtb: ufshc@1d84000: clocks: [[39, 99], [39, 7], [39, 98], [39, 107], [36, 0], [39, 106], [39, 105]] is too short
>   sc7180-idp.dtb: ufshc@1d84000: clock-names: ['core_clk', 'bus_aggr_clk', 'iface_clk', 'core_clk_unipro', ...] is too short
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml     | 34 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> index 1ab3d16917ac..7e6d442545ad 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ properties:
>            - qcom,msm8996-ufshc
>            - qcom,msm8998-ufshc
>            - qcom,sa8775p-ufshc
> +          - qcom,sc7180-ufshc
>            - qcom,sc7280-ufshc
>            - qcom,sc8180x-ufshc
>            - qcom,sc8280xp-ufshc
> @@ -43,11 +44,11 @@ properties:
>        - const: jedec,ufs-2.0
>  
>    clocks:
> -    minItems: 8
> +    minItems: 7
>      maxItems: 11
>  
>    clock-names:
> -    minItems: 8
> +    minItems: 7
>      maxItems: 11
>  
>    dma-coherent: true
> @@ -113,6 +114,31 @@ required:
>  allOf:
>    - $ref: ufs-common.yaml
>  
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - qcom,sc7180-ufshc
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        clocks:
> +          minItems: 7
> +          maxItems: 7
> +        clock-names:
> +          items:
> +            - const: core_clk
> +            - const: bus_aggr_clk
> +            - const: iface_clk
> +            - const: core_clk_unipro
> +            - const: ref_clk
> +            - const: tx_lane0_sync_clk
> +            - const: rx_lane0_sync_clk
> +        reg:
> +          maxItems: 1
> +        reg-names:
> +          maxItems: 1
> +
>    - if:
>        properties:
>          compatible:
> @@ -250,7 +276,7 @@ allOf:
>          reg:
>            maxItems: 1
>          clocks:
> -          minItems: 8
> +          minItems: 7
>            maxItems: 8
>      else:
>        properties:
> @@ -258,7 +284,7 @@ allOf:
>            minItems: 1
>            maxItems: 2
>          clocks:
> -          minItems: 8
> +          minItems: 7

I'm getting confused by the clock requirements for qcom,ice. Why does specifying
the qcom,ice phandle require these clocks? These are the UFSHC clocks and
already defined above.

- Mani

>            maxItems: 11
>  
>  unevaluatedProperties: false
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux