Re: [PATCH 01/23] block: don't reject too large max_user_setors in blk_validate_limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] block: don't reject too large max_user_setors in blk_validate_limits
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:14:51 +0900
Cc: Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Juergen E. Fischer" <fischer@xxxxxxxxx>, Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, HighPoint Linux Team <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian King <brking@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lee Duncan <lduncan@xxxxxxxx>, Chris Leech <cleech@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>, John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Yan <yanaijie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chandrakanth patil <chandrakanth.patil@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nilesh Javali <njavali@xxxxxxxxxxx>, GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@xxxxxxxxxxx, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux1394-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, megaraidlinux.pdl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, usb-storage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240324235448.2039074-2-hch@lst.de>
Organization: Western Digital Research
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 3/25/24 08:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We already cap down the actual max_sectors to the max of the hardware
> and user limit, so don't reject the configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Looks OK to me.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- convert SCSI to atomic queue limits, part 1
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 01/23] block: don't reject too large max_user_setors in blk_validate_limits
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 04/23] scsi: initialize scsi midlayer limits before allocating the queue
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/23] scsi: add a no_highmem flag to struct Scsi_Host
Previous by thread: [PATCH 01/23] block: don't reject too large max_user_setors in blk_validate_limits
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/23] block: don't reject too large max_user_setors in blk_validate_limits
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]