Re: [PATCH 2/4] scsi: ufs: Re-use exec_dev_cmd

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>]

On 3/4/24 01:23, Avri Altman wrote:
> +static int __exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp,
> +			  const u32 tag, int timeout)

Please choose a better name than __exec_dev_cmd. Function names in this 
file should start with the ufshcd_ prefix.

> @@ -3300,28 +3318,15 @@ static void ufshcd_dev_man_unlock(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>   		enum dev_cmd_type cmd_type, int timeout)
>   {
> -	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
>   	const u32 tag = hba->reserved_slot;
> -	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
> +	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
>   	int err;
>   
> -	lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
> -	lrbp->cmd = NULL;
>   	err = ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, cmd_type, tag);

Please restore the "lrbp->cmd = NULL" assignment. I don't think that it
is safe to remove that assignment.

Thanks,

Bart.