On 28.02.24 23:32, WeitaoWang-oc@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
@@ -602,6 +606,8 @@ static int uas_submit_urbs(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd, if (err) { usb_unanchor_urb(cmdinfo->data_out_urb); uas_log_cmd_state(cmnd, "data out submit err", err); + if (err == -ENODEV) + return -ENODEV;
This is a generic error code from errno.h
return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY;
This is not.
} cmdinfo->state &= ~SUBMIT_DATA_OUT_URB; @@ -621,6 +627,8 @@ static int uas_submit_urbs(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd, if (err) { usb_unanchor_urb(cmdinfo->cmd_urb); uas_log_cmd_state(cmnd, "cmd submit err", err); + if (err == -ENODEV) + return -ENODEV; return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY; } I'm not sure I fully understand what your mean. Whether the above code is more reasonable? If not,could you give me some suggestion? Thanks for your help!
You want to change uas_submit_urbs() to return the reason for errors, because -ENODEV needs to be handled differently. That is good. But why don't you just do return err; unconditionally? There is no point in using SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY Regards Oliver