Re: [PATCH] scsi: libsas: Fix disk not being scanned in after being removed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jason,

On 2024/2/23 15:04, Jason Yan wrote:
On 2024/2/23 12:04, yangxingui wrote:
Hi, John

On 2024/2/22 20:41, John Garry wrote:
On 21/02/2024 07:31, Xingui Yang wrote:
As of commit d8649fc1c5e4 ("scsi: libsas: Do discovery on empty PHY to
update PHY info"), do discovery will send a new SMP_DISCOVER and update
phy->phy_change_count. We found that if the disk is reconnected and phy
change_count changes at this time, the disk scanning process will not be
triggered.

So update the PHY info with the last query results.

Fixes: d8649fc1c5e4 ("scsi: libsas: Do discovery on empty PHY to update PHY info")
Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 9 ++++-----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index a2204674b680..9563f5589948 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -1681,6 +1681,10 @@ int sas_get_phy_attached_dev(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id,
          if (*type == 0)
              memset(sas_addr, 0, SAS_ADDR_SIZE);
      }
+
+    if ((SAS_ADDR(sas_addr) == 0) || (res == -ECOMM))
+        sas_set_ex_phy(dev, phy_id, disc_resp);
+
      kfree(disc_resp);
      return res;
  }
@@ -1972,11 +1976,6 @@ static int sas_rediscover_dev(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id,
      if ((SAS_ADDR(sas_addr) == 0) || (res == -ECOMM)) {
          phy->phy_state = PHY_EMPTY;
          sas_unregister_devs_sas_addr(dev, phy_id, last);
-        /*
-         * Even though the PHY is empty, for convenience we discover
-         * the PHY to update the PHY info, like negotiated linkrate.
-         */
-        sas_ex_phy_discover(dev, phy_id);

It would be nice to be able to call sas_set_ex_phy() here (instead of sas_get_phy_attached_dev()), but I assume that you can't do that as the disc_resp memory is not available.

If we were to manually set the PHY info here instead, how would that look?
Yes, I think it is indeed better to use sas_set_ex_phy, as you said, disc_resp memory is not available. Maybe we can use sas_get_phy_discover instead of sas_get_phy_attached_dev so we can use disc_resp?

Can we directly set phy->negotiated_linkrate = SAS_PHY_DISABLED here? For an empty PHY the other variables means nothing, so why bother get and update them?
The value of the negotiated link rate has two possible values ​​in the current processing branch: SAS_LINK_RATE_UNKNOWN and SAS_PHY_DISABLED, and both come from disc_resp. If we do not use disc_resp, but set a fixed value SAS_PHY_DISABLED for it, it may not be appropriate.

Thanks,
Xingui





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux