On 2/21/24 01:13, Can Guo wrote: > I am going to push some BUG fixes for Qualcomm UFSHCI MCQ engine, one of > which would count on a vops in ufshcd_send_command(). My original plan > was to add a new vops.mcq_setup_xfer_req() to differentiate from the > existing one used in legacy mode. But if Rohit moves the existing > .setup_xfer_req() up, I can use it instead of introducing the new one. Hi Can, Can we stick to the current approach of moving the .setup_xfer_req() up, keeping in mind the following pros? 1. Avoid redundant callbacks for setting up transfers 2. Trim the duration for which hba->outstanding_lock is acquired unnecessarily Thanks, Rohit.
