Re: [PATCH 00/10] scsi: Replace {v}snprintf() variants with safer alternatives

To: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] scsi: Replace {v}snprintf() variants with safer alternatives
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:40:55 -0800
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Adam Radford <aradford@xxxxxxxxx>, Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions <aacraid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andre Hedrick <andre@xxxxxxxx>, de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, drew@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joel Jacobson <linux@xxxxxxxxx>, John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx>, "PMC-Sierra, Inc" <aacraid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Hirst <rhirst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, support@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Tnx to <Thomas_Roesch@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240208084512.3803250-1-lee@kernel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 2/8/24 00:44, Lee Jones wrote:

Cc: Andre Hedrick <andre@xxxxxxxx>


Please take a look at https://lwn.net/Articles/508222/.

Thanks,

Bart.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] scsi: Replace {v}snprintf() variants with safer alternatives
  - From: Lee Jones

References:
- [PATCH 00/10] scsi: Replace {v}snprintf() variants with safer alternatives
  - From: Lee Jones