Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Clarify comments about the initial phy_gear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Clarify comments about the initial phy_gear
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:34:10 -0500
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, echanude@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240123-ufs-reinit-comments-v1-1-ff2b3532d7fe@redhat.com> (Andrew Halaney's message of "Tue, 23 Jan 2024 13:13:36 -0600")
Organization: Oracle Corporation

Andrew,

> The comments that currently are within the hw_ver < 4 conditional are
> misleading. They really apply to various branches of the conditionals
> there and incorrectly state that the phy_gear value can increase.

Applied to 6.9/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Clarify comments about the initial phy_gear
  - From: Andrew Halaney

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] scsi: hisi_sas: Minor fixes and cleanups
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: qcom: avoid re-init quirk when gears match
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Clarify comments about the initial phy_gear
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Clarify comments about the initial phy_gear
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]