Re: [PATCH RFC v3 for-6.8/block 04/17] mtd: block2mtd: use bdev apis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

在 2024/01/04 19:28, Jan Kara 写道:
On Thu 21-12-23 16:56:59, Yu Kuai wrote:
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

On the one hand covert to use folio while reading bdev inode, on the
other hand prevent to access bd_inode directly.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
...
+		for (p = folio_address(folio); p < max; p++)
  			if (*p != -1UL) {
-				lock_page(page);
-				memset(page_address(page), 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
-				set_page_dirty(page);
-				unlock_page(page);
-				balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(mapping);
+				folio_lock(folio);
+				memset(folio_address(folio), 0xff,
+				       folio_size(folio));
+				folio_mark_dirty(folio);
+				folio_unlock(folio);
+				bdev_balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(bdev);

Rather then creating this bdev_balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() just for
MTD perhaps we can have here (and in other functions):

				...
				mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
				folio_unlock(folio);
				if (mapping)
					balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(mapping);

What do you think? Because when we are working with the folios it is rather
natural to use their mapping for dirty balancing?

I think this is a great idea! And bdev_balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited()
can be removed as well.

Thanks,
Kuai


								Honza






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux