On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:16:03 +0200 Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:14:21 +0200 (CEST) > > Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > >> And one more update: > >> There is SAS too, > ... > >> + You need it > >> + - for classic parallel SCSI hardware, > >> + - for newer SCSI transports such as Fibre Channel, FireWire storage, > >> + SAS, or iSCSI, > > > > There is SRP too. > > I think I'll rewrite it as "for newer SCSI transports such as FireWire > storage." ;-) > > If SRP was in, can 'such as' be omitted? "for newer SCSI transports > (Fibre Channel, FireWire storage, iSCSI, SAS, SRP)," It might be necessary to add SSA too. > Or would be "for newer SCSI transports such as Fibre Channel, > FireWire storage, iSCSI, SAS, and more," be OK? scsi-ml has SPI, FC, iSCSI, SAS, and SRP transport classes (SRP is in scsi-misc now). It's a bit strange to omit only SRP, I think. But I might be too SRP-biased. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
