Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Large block for I/O

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 05:13:43AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> It clearly solves a problem (and the one I think it's solving is the
> size of the FTL map).  But I can't see why we should stop working on it,
> just because not all drive manufacturers want to support it.

I don't think it is drive vendors.  It is is the SSD divisions which
all pretty much love it (for certain use cases) vs the UFS/eMMC
divisions which tends to often be fearful and less knowledgeable (to
say it nicely) no matter what vendor you're talking to.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux