On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 08:28:21PM +0100, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 22:36 +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Except that the warning will be issued to users after each 10s for 40
> > years.
> > Atleast get rid of that.
>
> how about using dev_warn_once(), instead of dev_warn, using
> dev_warn_once() ensures the warning is issued only once.
>
Sounds good to me.
- Mani
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 953d50cc4256..b2287d2f9bf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -8205,7 +8205,7 @@ static void ufshcd_update_rtc(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
> ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts64);
>
> if (ts64.tv_sec < hba->dev_info.rtc_time_baseline) {
> - dev_warn(hba->dev, "%s: Current time precedes previous
> setting!\n", __func__);
> + dev_warn_once(hba->dev, "%s: Current time precedes
> previous setting!\n", __func__);
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Bean
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
