On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:36:41PM -0600, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 08:44:09PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > core_reset is optional, so there is no need to warn the user if it is not
> > available (that too not while doing host reset each time).
>
> What's the bit in the parenthesis mean here? I'm having a hard time
> following. Otherwise, this looks good to me.
>
I was just mentioning that the core reset can happen multiple times depending on
the scenario, so it doesn't make sense to print a warning each time if the reset
was not available.
- Mani
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > index dc93b1c5ca74..d474de0739e4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > @@ -296,10 +296,8 @@ static int ufs_qcom_host_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
> > bool reenable_intr;
> >
> > - if (!host->core_reset) {
> > - dev_warn(hba->dev, "%s: reset control not set\n", __func__);
> > + if (!host->core_reset)
> > return 0;
> > - }
> >
> > reenable_intr = hba->is_irq_enabled;
> > disable_irq(hba->irq);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
> >
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
