On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 07:41 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:19:48AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > Ok, after conferring with Oliver this morning, I think the best solution > > > here is to both revert the usb-storage suspend patch as it has some > > > basic problems that can cause data loss, _and_ add the change to the > > > kernel that by default disables autosuspend on all USB devices except > > > hubs. > > > > Are you referring to the disk spin-down issue? As far as I know, > > that's the only troublesome aspect of usb-storage autosuspend (apart > > from the fact that so many devices don't seem to support it very well, > > if at all). > > > > Solving the spin-down problem will require coordination with the SCSI > > developers. Basically, the SCSI core has to notify the HBA driver > > whenever the bus has been idle sufficiently long and all its devices > > are ready to be suspended. In particular, all disk heads should be > > parked and drives spun down, if they need to be. > > I am not sure. I will defer to Oliver for the knowledge of the details, > it was early in the morning and I can't remember them all exactly :) > > (although it might be a few days for him to respond, he's here at a > conference without a laptop, so his lag time might be a bit longer than > normal...) I'll wait, certainly ... enjoy the Czech backwoods. One thing I would say though is that if there's special action we have to take after autosuspend, it should probably be built into the framework Kristen is developing for ACHI link power management (your USB autosuspend is effectively a simple type of link power management as well). James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
