On Thursday, November 2, 2023 1:12 AM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/27/23 20:03, Karan Tilak Kumar wrote: > > > That is odd. > If you pass in 'mqtag' you can derive the hardware queue from it, so you don't need to pass it in separately. > Alternative it would make sense to pass in the 'tag' value instead of 'mqtag', as this would simplify the code (seeint that you don't have to call blk_mq_unique_tag_to_tag() all over the place). > > Cheers, > Hannes > > The former approach sounds better. I'll adopt it in v3. Regards, Karan
