Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Add compl_time_stamp_local_clock assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/1/23 00:14, Zhe Wang wrote:
The compl_time_stamp_local_clock assignment seems to have been
accidentally deleted in the previous patch, so it needs to be added
again for debugging needs.

Fixes: c30d8d010b5e ("scsi: ufs: core: Prepare for completion in MCQ")
Signed-off-by: Zhe Wang <zhe.wang1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 8382e8cfa414..b35977fa931f 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -5388,6 +5388,7 @@ void ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(struct ufs_hba *hba, int task_tag,
lrbp = &hba->lrb[task_tag];
  	lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_get();
+	lrbp->compl_time_stamp_local_clock = local_clock();
  	cmd = lrbp->cmd;
  	if (cmd) {
  		if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba, lrbp)))

Is anyone using the data tracked in compl_time_stamp /
compl_time_stamp_local_clock? I'm wondering whether the code for
tracking command duration can be removed. Otherwise the above patch looks fine to me.

Thanks,

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux