Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Support disabling fair tag sharing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

在 2023/10/27 0:29, Bart Van Assche 写道:
If blk_mq_get_tag() can't allocate a tag, and if multiple threads are
waiting for a tag, the thread that called blk_mq_get_tag() first is
granted the first tag that is released. I think this guarantees fairness
if all requests have a similar latency. There will be some unfairness if
there are significant differences in latency per logical unit, e.g.
because all requests sent to one logical unit are small and because all
requests sent to another logical unit are large. Whether or not this
matters depends on the use case.

I'm afraid that is not correct, fairness can't be guranteed at all, not
even with just one scsi disk. This is because there are 8 wait queues in
sbitmap, and threads are waiting in roundrobin mode, and each time
wake_batch tags are released, wake_batch threads of one wait queue will
be woke up, regardless that some threads can't grab tag after woken up,
what's worse, thoese thread will be added to the tail of waitqueue
again.

In the case that high io pressure under a slow disk, this behaviour will
cause that io tail latency will be quite bad compared to sq from old
kernel.

AFAIC, disable tag sharing will definitely case some regresion, for
example, one disk will high io pressure, and another disk only issure
one IO at a time, disable tag sharing can improve brandwith of fist
disk, however, for the latter disk, IO latency will definitely be much
worse.

Thanks,
Kuai


Thanks,

Bart.



.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux